Control and perpetuation of punitive high stakes standardized testing policies and chair of the ISBOE at stake. |
Dear Indiana State Board of Education,
The roots of cognitive science, the science of mind, brain and
learning, have been in existence since Socrates, Plato and Aristotle spoke and
wrote on such matters over 2500 years ago.
Research in cognitive science and cognitive neuro-science
conducted over the past 60 years, reveal Socrates, Plato and Aristotle had it
wrong when they described the mind as a blank slate and disconnected from the
body.
We know today, mind, body and spirit are all connected.
It is ironic, 2500 years later, the ISBOE continues to adopt
positions and mandate policies that perpetuate a conception of the mind that is
as antiquated as those of the ancient Greek philosophers.
The human mind, particularly children's minds are complex
organic entities, uniquely constructed with innate capacities and
competencies.
Policies that force educators to center curriculum around high
stakes standardized assessments, whereby tying teachers hands to provide
curriculum centered around children, is what the ISBOE has done.
The only learning theory from this governance body that I do see
supported through your policies, are the work of B.F. Skinner and Ivan Pavlov.
I am talking about radical behaviorism.
Over the past 8 years, Indiana citizens have observed the
intensification of high stakes standardized tests put upon
unsuspecting elementary aged children throughout Indiana public schools: http://indianapublicmedia.org/stateimpact/tag/iread-3/.
Data driven, selected response assessments are based on
behavioral analysis. How many selected response questions can a child correctly
answer? The outcome of this number has immense consequences. Thus, the ISBOE
has ensured that schools, administrators and teachers will structure
curriculum and learning experience around tests. Children are operantly
conditioned to answer selected response tests utilizing rewards and punishments.
If children do not answer enough questions correctly, schools, principals and
teachers will be punished. These are behaviorist learning principals. This is
operant conditioning.
High stakes standardized tests come at a steep cost.
I quote Jane Healy, Ph.D: "Driving the cold
spikes of inappropriate pressure into the malleable heart of a child's learning
may seriously distort the unfolding of both intellect and motivation. This
self-serving intellectual assault, increasingly condemned by teachers who see
it's warped product,...In a society that reveres the speed with which a product
can be extruded from the system, that has become impatient with the essential
process of childhood, that measures children's mental growth like steak on a
butchers scales, and that deifies test scores instead of taking the time to
respect developmental needs, EVERY CHILD IS POTENTIALLY IN JEOPARDY."
The beneficiaries of high stakes standardized testing? 26
million for McGraw Hill, millions to corporate supported charter schools,
Pearson and other ancillary ed tech companies selling high stakes standardized
scripted curricula and test prep materials.
Children are outside the decision making process central to the
learning experiences they are forced to participate in.
Looking at the big picture, mandated high stakes standardized
testing has been a disaster for Indiana children and society.
There are two kinds of learning in this world. The first is to
educate children so their intellectual gifts, innate capacities and instinctual
learning curiosities endowed to them by the Forces of the Universe will unfold
naturally.
The second form of learning experience can be seen in
authoritarian nations where the state imprints upon the minds of children, via
operant conditioning, what the state values.
What kind of state are we?
I can tell you with all honesty, a significant number of the 1.3
million Hoosiers who voted for Glenda Ritz, voted for her so the policy morass
she inherited from Tony Bennett would be corrected. We witnessed during the
Bennett-Daniels era, the narrowing of children's learning experiences,
defunding of public schools, humiliation of children and communities, and
degradation of educators based on their policies.
What Indiana citizens have observed during Supt. Ritz's time as
Chair of the ISBOE is a pattern of unwillingness by it's members to work with
her and unnecessary initiatives and shadow agencies created by Governor Pence
at tax payer expense that I can only describe as suspect.
Indiana Citizens will be watching to see what maneuverings take
place at tomorrow's July 9th ISBOE meeting.
My hope is that Superintendent Ritz will be allowed to do the
job of restoring stability in our schools that voters elected her to do.
Sincerely,
Clyde Gaw
Network for Public Education
Write or contact your ISBOE members, Governor and legislators here:
Contact Governor Pence: http://in.gov/gov/2333.htm
Contact the SBOE members: http://www.in.gov/sboe/2527.htm and http://www.in.gov/sboe/2423.htm
Contact your state legislators: https://capwiz.com/nea/in/home/
Write or contact your ISBOE members, Governor and legislators here:
Contact Governor Pence: http://in.gov/gov/2333.htm
Contact the SBOE members: http://www.in.gov/sboe/2527.htm and http://www.in.gov/sboe/2423.htm
Contact your state legislators: https://capwiz.com/nea/in/home/
I agree with most everything Clyde Graw is saying here--as a teacher for 30 some years. What do you think of this seemingly efficient approach. One thing modern brain research seems to agree on is that a concept is put in long term memory when there is an emotional connection to it. I take this to mean when the student is interested in it, motivated by the concept or finds it relevant to his/her life. I found this to be apparent, as did Maria Montessori, Daniel Greenberg and others decades ago. However now it is proven. Now that we know this it seems incumbent on teachers, parents or any adults interacting with kids to learn what the child's inclinations are in this regard = what are their interests and motivations and how might one serve the child with a flexible (as these interests may change and evolve) education plan that the student must be involved in as he/she is the only one that can sense these motivations.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments Al!
Delete